Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18444 (CHH)

DILEEP CHANDRAVANSHI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRR/416/2021 · 2025-06-15

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:24598 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 416 of 2021 Dileep Chandravanshi S/o Sh. Dwarika Prasad Chandravanshi Aged About 44 Years R/o Village Doukabandha, P.S. Pipariya, Tehsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh Present Address Ward No. 2, Ramnagar, Kawardha, P. S. Kawardha District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Pandatarai, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ... Respondent For Petitioner : None. For Respondent/State : Mr. Bharat Gulbani, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 16.06.2025 1 None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition when the case is called out. 2 Mr. Bharat Gulbani, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State, is present. 3 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: ABHISHEK SHRIVAS Digitally signed by ABHISHEK SHRIVAS Date: 2025.06.17 11:08:58 +0530 2 “(a) Set aside the impugned order dated 27.02.2021 passed by Smt. Swarn Lata Toppo Ld. A.S.J. Kabirdham (Kawardha) of Chhattisgarh, in Session Case No. 57 of 2020 titled as State versus Manoj Kashyap & Ors, wherein the Ld. A.S.J. has framed charges against the petitioner under Section 394 r/w Section 34 of the IPC, 397 r/w Section 34 of the IPC, 120B r/w Section 34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act r/w Section 34 of the IPC or (b) set aside the impugned order dated 27.02.2021 by amending the same as per law, in the interest of fair hearing and justice. (c) grant any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deems fit and proper in favour of revisionist, in the interest of justice.” 4 In view of the communication made by the trial Court concerned regarding disposal of Sessions Case No. 57 of 2020, it seems that the criminal case has been disposed of and as such, the matter has become infructuous. 5 Accordingly, instant criminal revision is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Abhishek