SATYA KUMAR SINGH (VISUALLY IMPAIRED) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. FOR HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/9994/2025 · 2025-10-29
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9994 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Personal affidavit filed by the Commissioner of Police, Lucknow is taken on record. In the affidavit, it has been submitted that the police is in no manner interfering in the property of the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that at the moment, there is no interference from the police authorities.
4. In light of the above, we are of the view that no cause of action remains at the present moment and accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
5. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to take steps, if necessary, in accordance with law, as and when required. October 29, 2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shwetabh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Satya Kumar Singh (Visually Impaired) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. For Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench