HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9342 of 2025 . Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.352 of 2025, under Section 65(2) of BNS and Section 5M/ 6 of POCSO Act, Police Station Mohammadpurkhala, District Barabanki. 3. In terms of the FIR, allegations were levelled that the daughter of the informant aged about 10 years was in the agricultural field when the applicant enticed her and committed wrong on her. The medical on record clearly corroborates the allegation. As per the medical report, the hymen was found to be torn and the blood stain was found. Injuries were also found on the body of the victim. The tentative age of the victim is 10 years and even the periods have not been started. 4. Considering the medical report corroborating the allegations and the age of the victim is 10 years, no ground for bail is made out. The bail application is rejected. 5. It would be open to the applicant to revive his bail after the statements Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nazmul Hasan, Amulya Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Farooq Ayoob Dharmraj Kurmi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civilsectt. Lko. And 3others .....Opposite Party(s) of the victim and the medical officer are recorded. November 27, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 9342 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench