SAIRA BANO v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.BASIC EDU.CIVIL SECTT.LKO.andORS.
WRIA/5523/2016 · 2025-11-14
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184410 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184410 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 5523 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State and Dr. Udai Veer Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 4 are present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 14, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dharmendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., P.S. Bajpai, Rahul Shukla (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Saira Bano .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lko.Andors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench