HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4136 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Heard. The present contempt application has been preferred alleging therein that the judgement and order dated 24.07.2025 passed in Matters under Article 227 No. 4374 of 2025 has not been complied with. The relevant part of the judgment and order dated 24.07.2025 is being reproduced hereinbelow:- "6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 6-Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, is directed to decide Case No.2078 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.T202404230302078, under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. " Learned Counsel for the applicant has submitted that the copy of the judgment and order of the Writ Court was served upon respondent on 01.08.2025 and from that three months period has already expired on 01.11.2025 but the same is still pending, hence, it amounts to wilful disobedience of the judgment and order passed in the Writ Petition and the respondent is liable to be punished under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bipin Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anoop Pandey .....Applicant(s) Dinesh Kumar, Presently Posted As Tehsildar Judicial Bikapur Distt. Ayodhya .....Opposite Party(s) From perusal of the order sheets enclosed collectively with the present contempt application as Annexure no. 3, it reveals that after service of the judgment and order of the Writ Court on 01.08.2025, the case was fixed on 26 dates, out of which on 22 dates, lawyers were abstaining from judicial work and on one date, there was holiday. So it cannot be said that the respondent is willfully or intentionally disobeying the judgment and order passed by the Writ Court. In view of the facts and circumstances mentioned hereinabove, no case of wilful disobedience of the judgment and order of the Writ Court is made out against the respondent. For the foregoing reasons, the present contempt petition is hereby dismissed. December 16, 2025 Ashish CAPL No. 4136 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench