- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19138 RSA No. 464 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.464 OF 2022 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. B. SUBBARAYAPPA S/O LATE BASAVALINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT BANNIGIRI GRAMA BYRAMANGALA POST BIDADI HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK RAMANAGARA-562 159. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. H. JAYANTH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. NAGARAJU S/O LATE BASAVALINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT BANNIGIRI GRAMA BYRAMANGALA POST BIDADI HOBLI RAMANAFGARA TALUK RAMANAGARA-562 159. 2. SRI. R. NARASIMAMURTHY S/O R.N. RANGACHAR AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT RAMAGUDLU UTTARAHALLI SOUTH BENGALURU-560 081. Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19138 RSA No. 464 of 2022 3. SRI. D. RAMAKRISHNA SINCE DEAD BY LRS SMT. RADHAMMA W/O LATE RAMAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 4. SRI. R. VENKATESH S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 5. SRI. R. KESHAVA MURTHY S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 6. SRI. R. DAMODHAR S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS 7. SRI. R. RADHAKRISHNA S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.3 TO 7 ARE RESIDING AT PATTAREDDYPALYA GRAMA UTTARAHALLI HOBLI KAGGALIPURA POST BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU-560 116. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. M. SHEELA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R3; SRI. M.D.BASAVANNA, ADVOCATE FOR R3 TO R7) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.04.2021 PASSED IN R.A.NO.22/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, RAMANAGARA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.03.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.278/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, RAMANAGARA. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19138 RSA No. 464 of 2022 THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has paid the cost in view of the order dated 22.07.2024, but not complied with the office objections, inspite of matter being listed for 7th time. This Court granted two weeks time to comply with the office objections on 22.07.2024 and for a period of ten months, the office objections are not complied with. Hence, the regular second appeal is dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9