SARVAN @ SHRAVAN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/1964/2025 · 2025-11-04
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184380 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184380 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1964 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the informant despite notice. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.77 of 2024, under Sections 376(3) IPC and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, P.S. Bighapur District- Unnao. 3. In terms of the FIR, it has been alleged that the daughter of informant, aged about 13 years, was missing and she was enticed away by the applicant. Subsequently, in the two statements of victim, she has not supported the prosecution version. There is no categorical document with regard to the exact age of the victim which has to be seen at the time of trial. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that the statements of victim do not corroborate with the prosecution story coupled with the fact that the applicant is in jail since 05.09.2024 having no criminal history, he is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Sarvan @ Shravan Kumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Gulam Mustafa, Prabhu Sharan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sarvan @ Shravan Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 4, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 1964 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench