Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18438 (CHH)

NIKHLESH GHRITLAHARE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

REVP/115/2025 · 2025-06-09

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:22917 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 115 of 2025 1 - Nikhlesh Ghritlahare S/o Maniram Ghritlahare Aged About 32 Years Presently Working As Assistant Fisheries Officer In The Office Of Assistant Director Of Fisheries Balodabazar District - Balodabazar - Bhatapara (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Fisheries Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Nava Raipur Atal Nagar District - Raipur (C.G.). 2 - Director Directorate Of Fisheries Indrawati Bhawan 4th Floor B- Block Nava Raipur Atal Nagar District - Raipur (C.G.). 3 - Devendra Kumar Sen S/o D.R. Sen Aged About 47 Years Presently Working In The Office Of Directorate Fisheries Indrawati Bhawan 4th Floor B- Block R/o Hig- 55 /103 Near Registy Office Sector - 29, Atal Nagar Nava Raipur (C.G.) - 492101. Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/ State : Mr. Ankur Kashyap, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Ashish Tiwari, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 10/06/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following prayer:- “It is therefore, prayed, that this Hon’ble Court may graciously pleased to allow this review petition, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for respondent No. 3 at the very outset submits that this review petition itself is not maintainable as order has been passed against respondent No. 3 as such at present there is nothing to review the order passed by this Court. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the present review petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat