HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 225 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. Shri Shubham Tripathi, learned counsel for the appellant says that the order impugned had been passed in contempt proceedings. Now the contempt itself has been withdrawn. 2. In view of the aforesaid, the appeal has become infructuous. We, accordingly, dismiss the appeal as having become infructuous. November 11, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Shubham Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Sameer Kalia, Anuj Kumar Mishra (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Ms. Archana Gaharwar .....Appellant(s) Mukesh Kumar And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench