RAM SUMER TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME. LKO
A482/6422/2018 · 2025-11-06
Rajeev Bharti
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184345 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184345 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6422 of 2018 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. Case called out.
2. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is of the year 2018.
3. The case is listed for the first time after the year 2018. When the matter was called out, none appeared on behalf of the applicant to press this application. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 is also not present. However, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State is present.
4. It appears that the applicant is not interested in pursuing the matter.
5. Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 6, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anurag Tilhari, Kapil Misra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Ram Sumer Tripathi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home. Lko .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench