Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184338 (ALL)

TARUN PANDEY AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/10097/2025 · 2025-11-06

Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10097 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1.Sri Vyas Narayan Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners do not want to press this petition as they have already availed the appropriate remedy available under Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, to which, there is no objection by learned A.G.A. . 2. In view of above, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. November 6, 2025 Shahnaz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vyas Narayan Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Tarun Pandey And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench