Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184337 (ALL)

NISHEE GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/6868/2025 · 2025-11-25

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6868 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.2- Tehsildar, Tehsil Bikapur, District Ayodhya to decide restoration application dated 7.7.2025 filed in case No.T202204230300855 under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code "Nishee Gupta Vs. Mohan Lal", expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no.2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.No.2- Tehsildar, Tehsil Bikapur, District Ayodhya is directed to decide restoration application dated 7.7.2025 filed in case No.T202204230300855 under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code "Nishee Gupta Vs. Mohan Lal" expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 25, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dharmendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Nishee Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench