MANOJ KUMAR TRIVEDI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN.SECY. TRANSPORT DEPTT. and OTHERS
SPLA/151/2021 · 2025-12-17
Rajan Roy, Rajeev Bharti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184332 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184332 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 151 of 2021 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. Heard.
2. Shri H.J.S. Parihar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant submits that although by an interim order passed in this appeal, one of the two inquiries, which were to be conducted, had been stayed. In spite of it, the inquiries have been completed and the appellant has been exonerated in both the inquiries. He has placed an order dated 4.6.2025 passed by the Managing Director, UPSRTC in respect of both the inquiries, which is taken on record. The said order says that in absence of original documents, it is not possible to conduct a fresh inquiry in the matter, therefore, it has been decided that it is not possible to hold such inquiry. Now, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this appeal.
3. In view of the aforesaid statement, the appeal is disposed of. December 17, 2025 Shravan Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Meenakshi Singh Parihar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ratnesh Chandra (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Manoj Kumar Trivedi .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Transport Deptt. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench