SHIV CHANDRA SAINI v. CANE COMMISSIONER 17-A NEW BARI ROAD LUCKNOW AND OTHERS
WRIA/22830/2016 · 2025-12-11
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184314 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184314 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 22830 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 11, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Pratap Singh, Atul Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Anand Shanker Asthana, K.S. Pawar, Karunesh Singh Pawar (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Shiv Chandra Saini .....Petitioner(s) Cane Commissioner 17-A New Bari Road Lucknow And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench