Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1843 (UTT)

MANOJ KUMAR CHUG v. SHALINI CHUG

CRLR/47/2020 · 2025-06-10

Vivek Bharti Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 10.06.2025 CRLR No.47 of 2020 Hon’ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J. Ms. Sweta Jain, learned counsel for the revisionist. 2. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy Advocate General along with Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned AGA and Mr. Prabhat Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the revisionist would submit that the parties have mutually compromised the matter, therefore, she seeks permission to withdraw the present revision. 4. Permission is granted. 5. In view of the above submission, the present revision is dismissed as withdrawn. (Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.) 10.06.2025 SS