Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1843 (AP)

SHAIK BAJI v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/4065/2025 · 2026-05-06

Subhendu Samanta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010071342025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 4065/2025 Between: 1. SHAIK BAJI, S/O SHAIL MOULALI, AGED ABOUT 33 YRS, 4-276/6, SAI MARUTHI NAGAR, NAVULURU, NOWLURU RURAL, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH-522503. 2. SHAIK MUNTHAZ,, W/O SHAIK MOULALI. AGED ABOUT 51 YRS, 4- 276/6, SAI MARUTHI NAGAR, NAVULURU, NOWLURU RURAL, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH-522503. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY HOME SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI RURAL POLICE STATION. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MANGALAGIRI RURAL POLICE STATION. 5. SK PYARIJAHA, D/O MEERA VALI, 4-460, NOWLUR, PUTTA THOTA, VTC MANGALAGIRI, NAVULURU-522503,GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased topleased to issue a writ order or direction more particulary one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the inaction of the Respondents No2 to 4 in not initiating appropraite action against the unofficial Respondent No.5 and her henchmen and supplemantally not providing the police protection in pursuance to Petitioner various police reports dated 9-1-2025, 16-1- 2025 addressed to the 2nd to 4th Respondents herein as highly illegal arbitrary unconstitutional and violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to consequently direct the Respondents 3 and 4 herein forthwith initiate appropriate action against unofficial Respondent No 5 and her henchmen and provide prolice protection to the Petitioner as required under law as per the Petitioners police reports and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4th Respondent to take appropraiate action i.e., to lodge a FIR and subsequently provide protection to the Petitioners, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SRUNGARAPATI KARTHIK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 4065/2025 ORDER: Mr. M. Veera, learned counsel representing Mr. Srungarapati Karthi, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner intends to withdraw the matter. Taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dated:07.05.2026. SSA