HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10553 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard Sri Gyanendra Pathak, learned counsel for the applicant as also the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking bail in Case Crime No. 0190 of 2025 under Sections 309(6), 317(2), B.N.S. P.S. Payagpur, District Bahraich. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is also stated that on similar allegations the co-accused Amresh Yadav alias Amrendra, Deepak Kashyap, Ritesh Gupta, and Sumit Patawa have been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench vide orders dated 14.11.2025, 08.10.2025, 29.10.2025 and 14.11.2025 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 11033 of 2025, 9164 of 2025, 8078 of 2025 and 8168 of 2025 respectively. It is also alleged that the applicant has no previous criminal history and he is in jail since 31.07.2025. It is also alleged that the applicant is entitled to liberty of bail on the ground of parity. 4. Learned A.G.A. Sri Veerpal Singh has opposed the prayer for bail, but he does not dispute the facts stated above. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case particularly the fact on similar allegations the co-accused Amresh Yadav alias Amrendra, Deepak Kashyap, Ritesh Gupta, and Sumit Patawa have been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench, it is a fit case for bail on the ground of parity. The application is accordingly allowed. 6. Let the applicant Vijay Yadav be released on bail in the aforesaid F.I.R./Case Crime No. 0190 of 2025 on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, on the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Gyanendra Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vijay Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (i) the applicant will not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant will not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant will appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. December 1, 2025 A.Nigam BAIL No. 10553 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench