DEEPAK SINGH @ DEEP S/O PARAMJEET SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/6171/2025 · 2025-06-18
Maneesh Sharma V J
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18427 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18427 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:23322] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6171/2025 Deepak Singh @ Deep S/o Paramjeet Singh, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Village Sarekhurd, Police Station Choupanki, District Khairthal Tijara. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.)
Order 18/06/2025
1. This bail application has been filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the accused-petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.92/2025 registered at Police Station Choupanki, District Bhiwadi for the offences punishable under Sections 8/ 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and alleged recovered contraband is below commercial quantity; there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and the petitioner is in judicial custody since 08.04.2025; the trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose, so the petitioner may be released on bail.
[2025:RJ-JP:23322] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6171/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the material available on record.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the arguments so advanced by the
learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that the alleged recovered contraband is below commercial quantity; considering the fact that petitioner is in judicial custody since 08.04.2025 and trial of the case may take considerable time, thus, without commenting any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow this bail application.
6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Deepak Singh @ Deep S/o Paramjeet Singh shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand only) with two sureties in the sum of Rs.75,000/- (Rupees Seventy Five Thousand only) to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. It is also made clear that the petitioner shall not tamper with any evidence nor would influence the witnesses in the case.
8. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in any offence(s) of similar nature during the currency of this bail and he shall mark his presence in the first week of every two months in concerned police station till trial is concluded.
[2025:RJ-JP:23322] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6171/2025]
9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the Trial Court to cancel this bail granted to him by this Court.
10. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard.
(MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.)),J SOURAV /70