HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10273 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs: "a. writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding to the opposite party no.2 to 4 who are not taking any steps in pursuance to the applications preferred by the petitioner on different dates as the opposite party no.5 to 8 is making construction over land of the petitioner in a most illegal and arbitrary manner. b. writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding to the opposite party no.2 to 4 to make impartial inquiry in to matter of the petitioner and take strict legal action against the responsible persons and opposite party no.5 to 8 may be restrain from make any hindrance in the construction of the house of the petitioner." 3. Upon perusal of the documents, it is clear that the writ petition is against private respondents being respondent nos. 5 to 8 and the cause of action is against the actions being taken by the private respondents. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Chandra Dwivedi, Uday Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Pradeep Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Revenue U.P. Lko. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. We are of the view that this writ petition is not maintainable as the reliefs as sought are basically against the private respondents. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum/authority for redressal of his grievance in accordance with law. November 3, 2025 Anupam S/- WRIC No. 10273 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench