[2025:RJ-JP:23275] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6185/2025 Vikram S/o Vinod Kumar, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Ward No. 38, Jhunjhunu, Police Station Kotwali Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu (Raj) (Presently Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Accused/Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arun Singh Shekhawat with Mr. Aditya Matolia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat,P.P. Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P. Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, P.P. Mr. Dharmendra Kumar for Mr. Shovit Jhajhariya HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.) Judgment / Order 16/06/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.0109/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu for the offence punishable under Sections 115 (2), 189(2), 331(6), 324(4) & 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he is in custody since 28-29.04.2025; all the main accused have been enlarged on bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court and no recovery has been made from the petitioner; the investigation/trial of the case will [2025:RJ-JP:23275] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6185/2025] take considerable time, therefore, further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose, so, petitioner be released on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the respondent have opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the material available on record and taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case particularly that all the co-accused persons have been enlarged on bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court, the petitioner is in custody since 28-29.04.2025 and trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, thus, without commenting any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to allow this bail application. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner Vikram S/o Vinod Kumar shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of ₹1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The petitioner shall not temper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. 8. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in any offence of similar nature during currency of the bail and he shall [2025:RJ-JP:23275] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6185/2025] mark his presence in first week of every two months in the concerned police station till trial is concluded. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 10. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. (MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.)),J Manish/121