1 2025:CGHC:18182 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2672 of 2025 1 - Smt. Parul Banerjee Wd/o Late Jaydev Banerjee Aged About 59 Years Occupation Housewife R/o Village Mangarhara Post Maharajganj District - Balrampur - Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director Danganiya Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Superintending Engineer Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited Bilaspur District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - The Executive Engineer Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited Raigarh Division District - Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.04.23 16:12:20 +0530 2 (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Rahul Mishra, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Shri Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 22.04.2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner who is widow of Late Jaydev Banerjee, who was working as Lineman with respondent Electricity Company died on 09.12.1996 seeking a direction towards the respondent to decide the representation of the petitioner, by which the petitioner is claiming the reitral dues like G.P.F., Gratuity, Group Insurance, Leave Encashment Pension etc. after the death of her husband. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner on several occasion submitted representation before the respondent, however, till date neither the representation has been decided nor the retiral dues has been released towards the petitioner. The petitioner by referring (Annexure P/2) i.e. a representation before the Executive Engineer CSPDCL/respondent No. 3 submits that this representation dated 28.02.2022 is still pending before the said authority, but till date the same has not been decided. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that if application is still pending, the same shall be considered and necessary order will be passed in accordance with law by verifying the entitlement of the petitioner towards the retiral dues of her husband namely Late Jaydev Banerjee. 3 4. I have heard both the parties and perused the pleadings. 5. Looking to the submission made by the respondents counsel, the representation (Annexure P/2) is before the respondent no. 3. The respondent no. 3 is directed to consider and pass necessary order in accordance with law, within a period of 60 days. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib