MUNEEM KUMAR @ MUNNAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/6790/2025 · 2025-11-06
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184234 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184234 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6790 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Rejoinder affidavit is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. None has appeared for the informant despite notice.
3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.217 of 2024, under Section 376(AB), 504, 506 IPC & Section 5m/6 of POCSO Act, P.S. Hardi, District Bahraich.
4. In terms of the FIR it was alleged that daughter of the informant aged about four years had gone to an agricultural field when the applicant caught hold of her and committed wrong on her. Age of the victim is around 4 years. Medical on record corroborates the allegation.
5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the grievous offence committed by the applicant duly corroborated by the medical on record, no good ground for bail is made out.
7. Present bail application is accordingly rejected.
8. The applicant would be at liberty to apply for fresh bail after the statement Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pawan Kumar Sharma, Rama Kant Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Muneem Kumar @ Munnam .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
of the victim and the statement of the medical officer is recorded. November 6, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 6790 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench