SURAJ GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
/12644/2025 · 2025-12-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184232 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184232 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12644 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. In the prosecution case, it is alleged that the applicant, by tampering with the cameras of the Bar Association, Hardoi, committed the theft of copper pipes from seven air conditioners, which amounts to Rs. 44,000/-. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant, while pressing the bail application, submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. There is no independent eyewitness to the alleged recovery. The offence is triable by a Magistrate. The applicant has explained his criminal history of eight cases in paragraph 2 of the bail application. It has been further submitted that applicant is in jail since 04.08.2025 and, if facility of bail is granted, there is no apprehension that he will flee from the judicial process and he will abide by the orders passed by the Court below and will co-operate in speedy trial of the case. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but has not disputed the factual submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-applicant. On due consideration of the facts that the applicant has been languishing in jail since 04.08.2025, the offence is triable by a Magistrate and he has explained his criminal history and the manner in which recovery has been Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mangal Sen Yadav, Deepansi, Sonal Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Suraj Gupta .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
conducted, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant- Suraj Gupta, involved in Case Crime/FIR No. 273 of 2025, under Sections 303(2), 317(2) BNS, Police Station-Kotwali City, District-Hardoi, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court.
Any other condition(s) which the trial court/concerned court may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case, may also be imposed. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. December 16, 2025 Vinay/- BAIL No. 12644 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench