1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1974 of 2025 1 - Omkara Assets Reconstruction Private Limited A Company Incorporated Under Companies Act 1956 And Registered With Reserved Bank Of India As An Asset Reconstruction Company, Having Its Corporate Office At 47th Floor, Kohinoor Square, N.C. Kelkar Marg, R.G. Gadkari Chowk, Dadar West, Mumbai- 400028, Acting In Its Capacity As Trustee Of Omkara Ps 22/2020-21 Trust Through Its Authorized Officer Mr. Manbir Chawla, Aged About 62 Years, Designated As Assistant Vice President Of Omkara Assets Reconstruction Private Limited (Respondent), Having Its Corporate Office At 47th Floor, Kohinoor Square, N.C. Kelkar Marg, R.G. Gadkari Chowk, Dadar West, Mumbai- 400028 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - M/s Shri Jai Gurudev Transport C/o Gangaram Lodhi, Having Address At H.No. 23/266s, Near Krishi Upaj Mandi, Ram Mandir, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Shri Mukesh Ramwani C/o- Shri Murlidhar Ramwani, Having Address At M-12, Subhash Chandra Ward No. 29, Khasra No. 516, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) Also At- C/o- Gangaram Lodhi, Having Address At H.No. 23/266s, Near Krishi Upaj Mandi, Ram Mandir, Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Smt. Anju Ramwani D/o Shri Laxman Das Munshi Having Address At M-12, Subhash Chandra Ward No. 29, Khasra No. 516, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Shri Chanki Ramwani S/o Shri Mukesh Ramwani Having Address At M-12, Subhash Chandra Ward No.29, Khasra No. 516, Shankar Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 5 - M/s Jai Shri Gurudev Transport, Having Address At M-12, Shriram Nagar, Near New Delhi Sweets, Phase Ii, Raipur (C.G.) 6 - Chief Judicial Magistrate Raipur Near Shastri Chowk, Raipur (C.G) Pin Code- 492001 ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Nikhil Wadhwani, Advocate appearing on behalf of Mr. Saurabh Jain, Advocate Digitally signed by SHAYNA KADRI 2 SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 22/04/2025 1. On the instructions of Mr. Saurabh Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Nikhil Wadhwani, Advocate submits that petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Shayna JUDGE