SANTOSH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/10620/2025 · 2025-11-06
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184227 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184227 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10620 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Jay Narayan Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ashish Saxena, learned Standing Counsel for the State of U.P.
2. By means of the instant writ petition, the petitioner has sought a direction to the authorities for removal of encroachment made over certain public land.
3. The writ petition does not make out any enforceable legal right of the petitioner and violation thereof.
4. The writ petition is not maintainable and is dismissed as such. However, dismissal of this writ petition will not preclude filing of fresh a petition in public interest. November 6, 2025 Pradeep/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jay Narayan Mishra, Sandeep Rawat, Simran Parveen Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Santosh Kumar Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench