Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184216 (ALL)

VINAY PRAKASH PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY. BASIC EDU. LUCKNOW AND ORS.

WRIA/6892/2020 · 2025-12-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 6892 of 2020 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. December 16, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Atul Kumar Dwivedi, Sourabh Rastogi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Vinay Prakash Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Basic Edu. Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench