RAM MILAN YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/12650/2025 · 2025-10-29
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184203 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184203 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12650 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned for payment of retiral dues such as General Provident Fund which has been withheld. It has been submitted that except for the said Fund, all the post-retiral benefits have already been paid to petitioner.
3. In view of innocuous prayer being made and without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation with regard to his grievance before opposite party no.2 i.e. District Magistrate/Collector, Pratapgarh. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of four weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order. In case petitioner is found entitled for aforesaid benefits, actual payment thereof shall be ensured within a period of six weeks thereafter. The aspect of grant of interest shall also be considered by opposite party within the same period.
4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. October 29, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lalji Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Ram Milan Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench