HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13700 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Sri Avaneesh Pal, Advocate, has put in appearance by way of filing Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite parties no. 3 to 5 and the same is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Avaneesh Pal, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 3 to 5. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 11-11-2025 passed by the General Manager NBCC Commercial Complex, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was appointed in the respondent-bank on 16-03-2021 and after completion of probation period, his services have been confirmed on 04-05-2022 and since the year, 2021, he has continuously been working in the respondent-bank and there is no complaint at all against him and his career is unblemished from the first day of his appointment. He further argued that on some reporting by the Institute of Banking Personnel Selection regarding non matching of bio-matrix, which was taken at the time of the examination, the enquiry has been contemplated and the petitioner has been put under suspension, though the services of the petitioner have already been confirmed and there is no occasion, after passing of more than four years to match the biometrics. He submits that apart from that, the allegation is that the photo of the petitioner is same, but, the name and father's name are slightly different on various pages of the form. He added that after passing of more than four years, this has been brought into the notice of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Avdhesh Shukla, Avaneesh Pal, Avdhesh Shukla, Vijyant Nigam Anuj Kumar .....Petitioner(s) The Executive Director Reserve Bank Of India And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) bank by the Institute of Banking Personnel Selection, but, that can be by some technical fault, for which the petitioner has been put under suspension. He submitted that there is no truthfulness in the charges levelled against the petitioner. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respondent- bank has opposed the contentions aforesaid and submitted that there are serious allegations against the petitioner, which may lead to the major punishment and therefore, the petitioner is not entitled for any relief. Considering the submissions of learned counsels for the parties and after perusal of records, it is apparent that the nature of the allegations are serious and that may lead to the major punishment. In this view of the matter, the opposite party no. 2/The Divisional Head (Administration), Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (IBPS), IBPS House, Kandivali (East), Mumbai, is directed to conclude the enquiry proceeding within the period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. The petitioner shall also cooperate in the enquiry proceedings. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. November 26, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 13700 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench