HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 683 of 2003 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Case called out in the revised call. 2. None is present for the appellant(s) when the case is taken up for hearing and there is no request for adjournment/pass-over made on behalf of the appellant(s). 3. It appears that since this matter pertains to the year 2003, appellant(s) has lost his interest in pursuing this case and therefore, by efflux of time, the appeal appears to have become infructuous. 4. The appeal is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. November 7, 2025 Anupam S/- Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Anil Srivastava, Arun Kumar Verma, Jagdish Prasad Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : Vinay Kant Shukla (Prashant Kumar,J.) Union Of India Thru General Manger And Anr .....Appellant(s) Steel Authority Of India Ltd. Thru Principal Officer .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench