VINAY KUMAR MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECY.SECONDARY EDU. AND ORS.
WRIA/3246/2012 · 2025-12-05
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184174 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184174 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 3246 of 2012 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 5, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nagendra B. Singh, Radha Kant Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C, Bagesh Shukla (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Vinay Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Through Principal Secy.Secondary Edu. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench