MERAJ ALI v. U.P. JAL NIGAM (URBAN) THRU. MANAGING DIRECTOR LKO. AND ANOTHER
/13365/2025 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184164 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184164 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13365 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Krishna Vishwakarma, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel for the opposite parties and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main relief :-
"(a)To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature mandamus commanding and directing the Opp. party No. 2 to provide all the service benefits like ACP, promotion, increments etc., to the petitioner from the date of his eligibility with all consequential benefit expeditiously or within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no.2/The Chief Engineer (E-2-2), U.P. Jal Nigam (Rural), Lucknow and the opposite party no. 2 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court.
Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties has no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 2/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Savita Jain Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rishabh Kapoor Meraj Ali .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban) Thru. Managing Director Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s)
The Chief Engineer (E-2-2), U.P. Jal Nigam (Rural), Lucknow within the period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 2 is
directed to consider and decide the same within further period of two months, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby
disposed of. November 20, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 13365 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench