Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184144 (ALL)

MOHD. VAZID v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

/830/2025 · 2025-11-24

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 830 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the informant despite notice. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.344 of 2024 under Sections 109, 191(2), 352, 351(3) BNS, P.S.- Hazratganj, District- Lucknow. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that on account of some dispute, all the accused named in the FIR started hitting the informant and his son. Allegations were leveled that 9 injures were inflicted upon the son of the informant. In view of the said, learned counsel for the applicant has drawn my attention to the medical record of the injured that indicates that the injured were discharged on the very next day of the admission and their medical reports do not indicate any substantial injury. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances and the medical report coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 09.12.2024 and has no previous criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Mohd. Vazid be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to her furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : D.K. Singh Somvanshi, Girish Kumar Pande, Pradyumn Shukla, Prashant Pandey, Qasim Abbas Zaidi, Sushil Kumar Gupta, Vijay Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd. Vazid .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 24, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 830 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench