Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184110 (ALL)

SURENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

BAIL/10884/2025 · 2025-11-17

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10884 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. The accused-applicant seeks bail in Range Case No.08 of 2025-26 under Section 9, 48(A), 51(1) Wild Life Protection Act, Police Station Majhgai, District Lakhimpur Kheri. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. The alleged recovery of 1kg meat is false. There is no independent witness to the recovery. The applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. The offence is triable by Magistrate. The applicant is in jail since 25.9.2025. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away after being released on bail or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but could not dispute the facts mentioned above. I have considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties as well as perused the record. On due consideration to the facts that the applicant is in jail since 25.9.2025, the offence is triable by Magistrate as also there is no independent witness to the recovery and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Surendra Singh, be released on bail in aforesaid case crime number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pratul Gupta, Ayush Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Surendra Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court below concerned with the following conditions: (i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. He shall cooperate in the trial. (iii) Any other condition which the trial court may deem fit and proper may also be imposed. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. November 17, 2025 kkb/ BAIL No. 10884 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench