Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184109 (ALL)

SANDEEP INGLE v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME and ANR.

/7477/2019 · 2025-11-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7477 of 2019 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. List revised. None appears on behalf of the applicant. Shri Ravi Srivastava, learned AGA is present. The instant application under Section 482 CrPC has been filed with the prayer to quash the impugned order dated 25.7.2019 arising out of F.I.R./ Case Crime No. 11 of 2018, under Sections- 498A,323,504,506 I.P.C. & Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station- Mahila Thana, District- Lucknow, in terms of compromise. From perusal of the record, it transpires that the parties have amicably settled their dispute by means of compromise deed (annexure-4). Vide order dated 22.10.2019, the parties were directed to appear before the Senior Registrar of this Court along with their counsels for verification of the said compromise deed and in compliance thereof, the verification was done and report has been submitted to this Court on 22.10.2019. Therefore, further criminal proceeding in the instant matter would amount to harassment and as such, the instant criminal proceedings arising out of Case Crime No. 11 of 2018 may be quashed. To which learned AGA for the State has no objection. In view of the above, since the applicant and the opposite party no.2 have already entered into compromise and no grievance remains to be agitated, hence further criminal proceedings in the aforementioned criminal case are Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravi Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sandeep Ingle .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s) liable to be set aside in view of the Judgements of the Apex Court rendered in B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another (2003)4 SCC 675; Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation[2008)9 SCC 677]; Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303; and Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab ( 2014) 6 SCC 466. Accordingly, criminal proceedings arising out of Case Crime No. 11 of 2018 are hereby quashed. The compromise deed shall be the part of this order. The application is allowed accordingly. November 28, 2025 Shravan A482 No. 7477 of 2019 2 (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench