RAM KISHUN YADAV @ RAM SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
/6705/2025 · 2025-11-19
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184102 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184102 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6705 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.0166 of 2025 under section 115(2) and 105 BNS, P.S. Kotwali Ayodhya, District Ayodhya.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that on 08.04.2025, the informant had gone along with his two nephews for temple visit and while they are enjoying on the road, the applicant who was driving the vehicle No.UP-78 CN-3255 drove the vehicle negligently, which resulted in an accident and despite trying to stop, the vehicle did not stop, which resulted in the death of one of the nephew.
4. Considering the said averment, the counsel for the applicant argues that there is no motive assigned to the applicant and the incident was an accident as is evident from the FIR allegation itself.
5. Considering the fact that the material to implicate the applicant under section 105 is apparently missing, the applicant who is in custody since 11.04.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to bail. Thus the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Ram Kishun Yadav @ Ram Singh be released on bail Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prashant Vikram Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ram Kishun Yadav @ Ram Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 19, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 6705 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench