Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184100 (ALL)

SUNIL KUMAR CHAURASIYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/3692/2025 · 2025-11-25

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3692 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.144 of 2025, under Sections 3(5), 103(1), 352 of BNS, Police Station Kotwali Sadar, District Lakhimpur Kheri. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the son of the informant had a fight with the accused named in the FIR with regard to playing a song by D.J. It was also alleged that three accused had committed the murder of the son of the informant by firearm injury. In terms of the statement of the eyewitness, who is the son-in-law of the informant, the allegation of inflicting firearm injury was assigned to the co-accused Anshu Mishra and the allegation of the applicant was helping him in the commission of the offence. The statement of the son-in-law of the informant is on record as Annexure-5 to the bail application. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the statement of the eyewitness, who has not assigned the role of firing to the applicant coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 25.02.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aman Kumar Shrivastav, Lalji Prasad Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sunil Kumar Chaurasiya .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Let the applicant Sunil Kumar Chaurasiya be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 25, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 3692 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench