HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No.188 of 2025 Sherkhan …..….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, Deputy Advocate General for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) The applicant is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No.30 of 2025, dated 13.01.2025, under Sections 109(1) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3/25(1-B)(B) of the Arms Act, 1959, Police Station Kotwali Manglour, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that it is a case of firing, but no-one was injured and, in fact, the applicant sustained injury in his knee. 4. Learned State counsel would submit that the FIR as well as the investigation does not reveal that any injury was caused to any police personnel. 2 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 6. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount; to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 13.02.2025 Sanjay