HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1100 of 2025 Court No. - 20 HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri Suresh Chandra Kushwaha, learned Standing Counsel for the State-opposite party nos.1 to 3 and Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha-opposite party no.4. 2. Sri Arpit Verma, Advocate has filed his Vakaltnama on behalf of opposite party nos.5 to 8. The same is taken on record. 3. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- opposite parties has raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the present Public Interest Litigation as the petitioner has not disclosed the credentials and other details that are required under Sub-Rule (3-A) of Rule 1 of Chapter XXII of the Allahabad High Court Rules (Rules of the Court) 1952, which has been amended in the light of judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Uttranchal versus Balwant Singh Chaufal & others reported in 2010 AIR SCW 1029. 4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he does not want to press this petition and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn. 5. The prayer so made by learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed. 6. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. November 13, 2025 Abhishek Gupta Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) Phool Chandra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Sectt. Lko. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench