Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184078 (ALL)

RAJKARAN ALIAS KARAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS

/8225/2024 · 2025-11-19

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8225 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.121 of 2024, under Sections 376, 506, 323, 363 IPC and Section 3/4 (2) of POCSO Act, Police Station Jaidpur, District Barabanki. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 14 years was enticed and wrong was committed on her. In the statement under Section 161 of Cr.P.C., the victim stated that an attempt was made to commit wrong. As per the postmortem report, the hymen was partially teared. No fresh injuries were noticed. In the supplementary medical report, it was stated that internal examination suggested old injury. The tentative age of the victim is 15 years. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the fact that all the facts witnesses have been examined as per the statement of the applicant and the applicant is in custody since 07.04.2024 and has no criminal antecedents, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amrit Kumar Tiwari, Archana Rawat, Rahul Kumar Kaushal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajkaran Alias Karan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Let the applicant Rajkaran Alias Karan be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 19, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 8225 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench