HIMANSHU YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND 2 OTHERS
CRLR/405/2022 · 2025-12-11
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184076 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184076 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 405 of 2022 Court No. - 27 HON'BLE RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J.
1. None appeared from the side of the revisionist.
2. Heard learned AGA and perused the record.
3. Instant criminal revision under Section 102 of Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2015 has been preferred against the order dated 17.02.2022 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Unnao as well as judgment and order dated 02.04.2022 passed by learned Additional Session Judge, Court No.13, Unnao in Criminal Appeal No.18/2022 under Section 101 of Juvenile (Care & Protection of Children) Act 2015, whereby the the prayer for bail has been refused.
4. It has been informed that the revisionist has already been released on bail vide order dated 25.05.2022 passed by this Court. Charge sheet has been submitted for facing trial on heinous charges. Nothing remains to be decided and as such, revision has become infructuous.
5. The revision stands dismissed as having become infructuous. December 11, 2025 KR Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Vineet Kumar Chaurasia, Ram Naresh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.) Himanshu Yadav .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench