SHOBIT PANDEY THRU. MOTHER SUDHA DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
/6775/2025 · 2025-11-19
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184056 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 184056 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6775 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3.The petitioner has made oral request for permission to implead concerned Tehsildar as a necessary party.
4. The oral request is allowed. He is permitted to incorporate the impleadment during course of the day.
5. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to Tehsildar, Tehsil Gola, , District Lakhimpur Kheri i.e. respondent No.3 to decide Case No.7142/2023, computerized case No.T 202310430307142 (Shobhit Pandey and others Vs Ram Sahai) under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no.3 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 3 - Tehsildar, Tehsil Gola, , District Lakhimpur Kheri is directed to decide Case No.7142/2023, computerized case No.T 202310430307142 (Shobhit Pandey and others Vs Ram Sahai) under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code expeditiously, say within a period of four months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned , if there is no legal impediment.
8. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rupali Srivastava, Alka Rani, Ambrish Kumar, Kundan Lal Adlakha, Sarita Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shobit Pandey Thru. Mother Sudha Devi And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s)
expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
9. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 19, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 6775 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench