HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10592 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Shri K.K. Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for State- respondents no. 1 to 3 and Shr Pankaj Gupta, who has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no.4. 2. The present writ petition has been filed assailing the order dated 26.9.025 passed by the Tehsildar, Bhinga, District Shravasti in Case No. 06609/2024, Computerize No. T20240806609, Ramdev vs. Gram Sabha, under Section 34, U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 3. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel that the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy of filing an appeal under section 35(2) of U.P. Revenue Code. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid proposition. 5. Accordingly, in the light of the above, petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy as the petitioner may file an appeal against the impugned order. November 4, 2025 Muk Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Kumar Verma, Prinsi Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Alok Mathur,J.) Saiphal @ Adalti Prasad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench