Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 184017 (ALL)

GHERRAU YADAV v. U.O.I. THRU. SECY.-MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT HIGH WAYS DEPTT. OF CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/10422/2025 · 2025-11-14

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10422 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Ambrish Rai, learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 3 and 4. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner has made following main prayer(s): "A. Issue a order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties Not to take possession of excess land of petitioner which has not been acquired by NHAI, and Not to use the petitioner's Land beyond demarcated boundaries as mentioned in Annexure No 03 of Writ Petition. B. Issue a order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opp.no 4 to decide the petitioners application annexed as annexure no 04, pending before him, in accordance with Law." 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 3 and 4 has produced before this Court instructions dated October 16, 2025 sent by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Amethi, District Amethi, wherein it has been stated that the respondents are not encroaching the petitioner's Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Virendra Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Ambrish Rai, C.S.C., Samidha Gherrau Yadav .....Petitioner(s) U.O.I. Thru. Secy.-Ministry Of Road Transport High Ways Deptt. Of Child Development And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) excess land, which has not been acquired by the National Highways Authority of India. The aforesaid instructions are kept on record. 4. In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this matter. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of having become infructuous. November 14, 2025 Anupam S/- WRIC No. 10422 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench