Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18401 (KAR)

SMT. NAGAMMA v. SRI. CHELUVAIAH

WP/35819/2018 · 2025-04-01

M I Arun

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:13662 WP No. 35819 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.35819 OF 2018 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NAGAMMA W/O. SUNDARAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT MELEHALLI VILLAGE KOOTAGAL HOBLI RAMANAGAR TALUK RAMANAGAR DISTRICT-562 154. …PETITIONER [BY SRI RAJANNA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)] AND: 1. 1(a). SRI CHELUVAIAH SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS. SMT. RANIYAMMA W/O. LATE CHELUVAIAH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 1(b). SANTHILKUMAR S/O. LATE CHELUVAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 1(c). SMT. LAKSHMI D/O. LATE CHELUVAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:13662 WP No. 35819 of 2018 1(d). SRI VENKATESH S/O. LATE CHELUVAIAH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF THIMMASANDRA GATE KADDALIDODDI, KUTGAL HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT-562 154. 2. 2(a). SRI RAJENDRA SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS. SMT. MALLIKAMMA, W/O. LATE RAJENDRA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 2(b). SRI. SUBRAMANYA S/O. LATE RAJENDRA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS 2(c). SMT. PAVITHRA D/O. LATE RAJENDRA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS 2(d). SRI. SATHISHA S/O. LATE RAJENDRA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF THIMMASANDRA GATE KADDALIDODDI, KUTGAL HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT. 3. SRI MANJA SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:13662 WP No. 35819 of 2018 3(a). SMT. PREMA W/O. LATE MANJA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 3(b). KUM. SOUMYA D/O. LATE RAJENDRA AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS 3(c). KUM. MEGHA D/O. LATE MANJA AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS 4. SRI SUNDRA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 5. SMT. JAYAMMA W/O. ERAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 6. SRI ANGADI LINGEGOWDA S/O. LINGE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESPONDENT NOS.3 TO 6 ARE R/AT THIMMASANDRA GATE KADDALIDODDI, KUTGAL HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT-562 154. …RESPONDENTS (R.1(a), (c), (d), R.2(a), R.2(b), R.2(c), R.2(d), R.3(a), R.3(b), R.3(c ), R.5 AND R.6 ARE SERVED.) - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:13662 WP No. 35819 of 2018 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH/SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN MIS.PETITION NO.12/2014 DATED 02.03.2018 AND THE ORDER PASSED IN MIS.PETITION 14/2018 DATED 27.04.2018 VIDE ANNEXURES-D & F IN DISMISSING THE SAID MIS.PETITION PASSED BY THE HON'BLE CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION AND JMFC., AT RAMANAGAR, IN ORDER TO DISPOSE-OFF THE R.A.NO.41/2011 ON MERITS, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER None appears for the petitioner even when the matter is called out for the second time today. The writ petition is of the year 2018. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE hkh. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3