Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1840 (PNJ)

RISHAV SHARMA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/70731/2025 · 2026-01-22

Subhas Mehla

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 126 CRM-M-70731-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 22.01.2026 Rishav Sharma ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present:- Mr. Abhimanyu Batish, Advocate for Mr. Deepak Agnihotri, Advocate for the petitioner. **** SUBHAS MEHLA , J. (Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of BNSS Act, for issuance of a direction to respondent No.1 to 4 to hand over the enquiry/investigation in FIR No.85 dated 05.06.2024, registered under Sections 406, 420, 120-B of IPC at Police Station Division No.5, Police Commissionerate Ludhiana to some independent agency. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that bail petition i.e. CRM-M-43453-2024 of respondent No.7-Manish Aggi has been dismissed by the Hon’ble High Court vide order dated 24.09.2024 (Annexure P-2) and he has challenged the aforesaid order before Hon’ble Supreme Court, wherein also SLP (Crl.) No.18762-2025 has been dismissed vide order dated 26.11.2025 (Annexure P-3); and two months have been passed, but no action has been taken against respondent No.7. Thus, learned counsel prayed for a direction to hand over investigation to some independent agency. GEETA RANI 2026.01.26 12:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh CRWP-70731-2025 (O&M) ( 2 ) 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Anup Singh, AAG, Punjab, upon advance notice, puts in appearance on behalf of respondent-State and submitted that non-bailable warrants have been issued against respondent No.7 - Manish Aggi for 19.02.2026; challan against one co-accused has already been presented after completion of investigation; investigating agency will make sincere efforts to arrest him and to complete the investigation expeditiously. 5. Heard. 6. Keeping in view the submission made by learned State counsel that non-bailable warrants against respondent No.7 have already been issued, the present petition is disposed of. ( SUBHAS MEHLA ) 22.01.2026 JUDGE Geeta Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No GEETA RANI 2026.01.26 12:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh