SONU @ SONU VISHWAKARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/9209/2025 · 2025-11-03
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183999 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183999 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9209 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Ajeet Kumar and Shri Dharmendra Kumar Gautam, Advocates on behalf of respondent no. 2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2 and perused the record. 3. The present application has been filed with the prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 05.10.2010 as well as summoning order dated 01.09.2025 passed in Criminal Case No. 1090 of 2011, arising out of Case Crime No. 1007 of 2010, under Sections 379 and 511 I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali Akbarpur, District Ambedkar Nagar. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the parties have amicably settled their dispute and a compromise has been arrived between them on 28.10.2025 (Original copy of the same is appended as Annexure No. 4 to the application). 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the court below, before which, the case is pending. Therefore, the compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the court below itself. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rankaj Kumar Vishwakarma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sonu @ Sonu Vishwakarma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Accordingly, the application is disposed of with direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notice to all its signatories requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 7. For a period of two weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the present applicant. 8. Registry is directed to hand over the original copy of the compromise to the learned counsel for the applicants after retaining photocopy of the same.
November 3, 2025 VKS A482 No. 9209 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench