Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183997 (ALL)

MOHAMMAD SADIK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/1681/2025 · 2025-11-11

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1681 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. 2.The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No. 26 of 2025, under sections 318(4), 319(2) B.N.S and Section 66 (c) I.T Act, P.S. Cyber Crime, District Bahraich. 3.Learned counsel for applicant, after arguing at some length, submits that he does not want to press the anticipatory bail application; rather he may be granted liberty to file regular bail application and the same may be decided in the light of judgment of Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021. 4.In view of the above, the prayer for anticipatory bail is refused and the application is dismissed as not pressed. However, it is provided that in case the applicant files a regular bail application within two weeks from today, the same be decided expeditiously, strictly in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). November 11, 2025 DiVYa Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Mohammad Sadik .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench