Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183987 (MAD)

Rado Recreation Club v. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar

WP Crl.(MD)/2459/2025 · 2025-12-09

S Srimathy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP CRL.(MD). No.2459 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 09.12.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P.CRL.(MD). No.2459 of 2025 Rado Recreation Club, Rep. by its Secretary, C.Alexander, S/o.Chinnappan, No.9/417P, Railway Feeder Road, Asilapuram, Solapuram Panchayat, Rajapalayam Union, Virudhunagar District. ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rajapalaym, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Dhalavaipuram Police Station, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to forbear the respondents from interfering with the lawful activity of playing ‘Rummy’ (13 cards) without stakes or money by the members of the petitioner 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.2459 of 2025 Club, based on the representation dated 23.06.2025, and to pass such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit and proper. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Bashyam, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction, forbearing the respondents from interfering with the lawful activity of playing Rummy (13 cards) by the members of the petitioner Club. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that he is running a recreation club, where their members play rummy without stakes, and that the police are very frequently interfering and harassing them. Therefore, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition with the aforesaid prayer. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that Section 3 of the City Police Act, 1888 defines "the Common Gaming House". Section 45 of City Police Act prescribes the punishment for using a place as a "Common Gaming House". A reading of both the 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.2459 of 2025 provisions show that in a place, where game is played on wager or bet, the police have got right to interfere and prosecute the persons, who run the place, under Section 45 of the City Police Act. In this case, the petitioner is running a recreation club for its members, wherein according to the petitioner, game of rummy is played without stakes. 4. However, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), on instructions, submitted that the police are not causing any disturbance to the activities of the petitioner. 5. The submission of the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) is recorded. It is also seen that a Division Bench of this Court in the case of the Director General of Police, State of Tamil Nadu, Mahalakshmi Cultural Association report in 2012(2) CTC 484 has gone into this aspect of recreation club permitting the recreation club to play rummy without stakes and held as follows : "24. On the basis of the above discussions, we arrive at the following conclusions: (1) The game of rummy (13 card) is only a game of skill even though an element of chance is also involved. (2) In the event rummy is played by the members 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.2459 of 2025 or the guests without stakes, the provisions of the Chennai City Police Act are not attracted. (3) In the event rummy is played by the members of the guests with stakes, the provisions of the Chennai City Police Act are attracted. (4) In the event the Club/Association either allows its members or gusts to play rummy with stakes or make any profit or gain out of such gambling, the police has the authority to invoke the provisions of the Chennai City Police Act. (5) In order to ascertain as to whether the premises is used as a gaming house for gambling, the police is entitles to invoke Section 23 of the Act." 6. In view of the above, this Court directs that (i) the petitioner Club shall not indulge in any activity by allowing its members or the guests to play rummy (13 cards) with stakes and make profit or gain. (ii) the police are entitled to take action in the event of any illegal activity is carried on in the Club premises. (iii) the police shall not disturb the petitioner-Club frequently under the guise of inspection without there being any reliable information as to the illegal activities of the Club or its members or the 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.2459 of 2025 guests. 7. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. (SSYJ) 09.12.2025 pal To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rajapalaym, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Dhalavaipuram Police Station, Virudhunagar District. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.2459 of 2025 S.SRIMATHY,J. pal ORDER IN WP.CRL.(MD) No.2459 of 2025 Date: 09.12.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis