MOHAMMAD MORSALIN @ MURSALIN ( NAMED AS MORSALIM IN FIR) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. CIVIL SECTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/7228/2024 · 2025-11-13
Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183986 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 183986 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7228 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case, the investigation has already been concluded and the charge sheet has also been submitted against the petitioner, as such, this writ petition has rendered infructuous.
2. Learned A.G.A. could not dispute the aforesaid fact.
3. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with the liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage.
November 13, 2025 R Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prabhat Kumar Mishra, Arun Kumar, Chetan Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Mohammad Morsalin @ Mursalin ( Named As Morsalim In Fir) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM ASARE MORYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench