Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 183985 (ALL)

KUNDAN KASHYAP v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/9433/2025 · 2025-11-27

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9433 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Counter affidavit filed by the State is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.39 of 2025, under Sections 65(2) of BNS and Section 5M/ 6 of POCSO Act, Police Station Gazipur, District Lucknow. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 3.5 years was enticed by the applicant and committed rape. The medical on record clearly corroborates the allegation. As per the medical report, vaginal and anus have become single. 4. Considering the medical report and the age of the victim, no case for bail is made out. The bail application is rejected. November 27, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shalu Pandey, Amit Kumar Sonkar, Ashish Kharwar, Mohit Singh, Rahul Kumar Shukla, Shivam Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Kundan Kashyap .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench